1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
one-true-houselight
prettyasapic

Every person need to be taught disability history

Not the “oh Einstein was probably autistic” or the sanitized Helen Keller story. but this history disabled people have made and has been made for us.

Teach them about Carrie Buck, who was sterilized against her will, sued in 1927, and lost because “Three generations of imbeciles [were] enough.”

Teach them about Judith Heumann and her associates, who in 1977, held the longest sit in a government building for the enactment of 504 protection passed three years earlier.

Teach them about all the Baby Does, newborns in 1980s who were born disabled and who doctors left to die without treatment, who’s deaths lead to the passing of The Baby Doe amendment to the child abuse law in 1984.

Teach them about the deaf students at Gallaudet University, a liberal arts school for the deaf, who in 1988, protested the appointment of yet another hearing president and successfully elected I. King Jordan as their first deaf president.

Teach them about Jim Sinclair, who at the 1993 international Autism Conference stood and said “don’t mourn for us. We are alive. We are real. And we’re here waiting for you.”

Teach about the disability activists who laid down in front of buses for accessible transit in 1978, crawled up the steps of congress in 1990 for the ADA, and fight against police brutality, poverty, restricted access to medical care, and abuse today.

Teach about us.

dragonofeternal

Oh! Oh! I got one! Meet Edward V. Roberts-

image

Ed Roberts was one of the founding minds behind the Independent Living movement. Roberts was born in 1939, and contracted polio at age 14, two years before the vaccine that ended the polio epidemic came out (vaccinate your kids). Polio left Roberts almost completely paralyzed, with only the use of two fingers and a few toes. At night, he had to sleep in an iron lung, and he would often rest there during the day as well. Other times of the day, he breathed by using his face and neck muscles to force air in and out of his lungs.

Despite this being the fifties, Roberts' mother insisted that her son continue schooling. Her support helped him face his fear of being stared at and ridiculed at school, going from thinking of himself as a "hopeless cripple" to seeing himself as a "star." When his high school tried to deny him his diploma because he had never completed driver's ed, Roberts and his mother fought the school and won.

This marked the beginning of his career as an activist.

Roberts had to fight the California Department of Vocational Rehabilitation for support to attend college, because his counselor thought he was too severely disabled to ever work or live independently. Roberts did go to school, however, first attending the College of San Marino. He was then accepted to UC Berkeley, but when the school learned that he was disabled, they tried to backtrack. "We've tried cripples before, and it didn't work," one dean famously said. The school tried to argue the dorms couldn't accommodate his iron lung, so Roberts was instead housed in an empty wing of the school's Cowell Hospital.

image

Roberts' admittance paved the way for other disabled students who were also housed in the new Cowell Dorm. The group called themselves "The Rolling Quads," and together they fought and advocated for better disability support, more ramps and accessible architecture like curb cut outs, founded the first formally recognized student-led disability services program in the country, and even managed to successfully oust a rehabilitation counselor who had threatened two of the Quads with expulsion for their protests.

After graduation from his master's, he served a number of other roles- he taught political science at a number of different colleges over the years, served on the board for the Center for Independent Living, confounded the World Institute on Disability with Judith E. Heumann and Joan Leon, and continued to advocate for better disability services and infrastructure at his alma mater of UC Berkeley.

image

Roberts also took part in and helped organize sit ins to force the federal government to enforce section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which stated that people with disabilities should not be excluded from activities, denied the right to receive benefits, or be discriminated against, from any program that uses federal financial assistance, solely because of their disability. The sit-in occupied the offices of the Carter Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare building in San Francisco and lasted 28 days. The protestors were supported by local gay rights organizations and the Black Panthers. Roberts and other activists spoke, and their arguments were so compelling that members of the department of health joined the sit in. Reagan was forced to acknowledge and implement the policies and rules that section 504 required. This national recognition helped to pave the way for the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990.

Roberts died of cardiac arrest in 1995 at the age of 54, leaving behind a proud legacy of advocacy and activism. Not bad for a "hopeless cripple" whose rehab counselor thought he was too disabled to ever work.

awlwren

[id: a black and white photograph of Roberts, a bearded white man, sitting in his chair and smiling with a ventilator tube between his teeth.

A younger Roberts lying in an Iron Lung with a cup with a straw next to his head.

Two photographs, one of Roberts and a black man with a service dog (probably a seeing eye dog) walking along a path together, the other of Roberts participating in a march, with another man behind him holding a sign saying “Civil Rights for Disabled”]/end id.

one-true-houselight
ghostonly

Ableism in Subtitles

Something that really pisses me off is the litany of ableist issues found in subtitles. So, let's talk about 3 huge issues that need to stop.

Subtitles should never ever say [Speaking -language-]

When a hearing person is watching a TV show, or a stream, if someone starts speaking another language, if that hearing person knows that language, they will get to know what the person said, regardless of if the average viewer knows that foreign language.

Deaf and HOH viewers deserve the same opportunity, and to rob them of that opportunity by putting [speaking -language-] in the subtitles is ableist.

Every word spoken in a show or movie, unless given translated subtitles in the uncaptioned version of the show or movie, should have every word captioned exactly as it's spoken. If someone starts speaking Spanish, the words spoken in Spanish should be subtitled in Spanish. If someone starts speaking German, the words spoken in German should be subtitled in German.

When a show or movie is created, if you want a character to speak a foreign language, you get an actor who can speak that language. When you hire someone to transcribe a show into subtitles, your hire someone who can speak the languages spoken in the show, or you have them mark points where a foreign language speaker will need to assist and then have someone who speaks that language add in the parts that the transcriptionist can't.

Subtitles should never be cut short for convenience

This is something I see constantly. Shows and movies will frequently cut out words or even large chunks of a sentence from the subtitles to make the subtitles shorter.

When you remove descriptive words, parts of a sentence, or even whole sentences to cut down on the amount of subtitles in a given segment, you are completely changing the attitude, mood, and expression of those sentences. You can completely ruin all of the implicit feelings in a sentence if you remove words that show feelings or the way a person phrases things.

It is not your moral right, as a company or transcriptionist, to decide that deaf or HOH viewers shouldn't get the original phrasing.

I am not deaf or HOH. I have APD and have to use subtitles to keep up with what's being said, or I won't process it fast enough. Because of that, I get to see all of the ways subtitles deviate from the original wording all the time. This isn't an issue that just happens here and there. It happens in pretty much every episode of every show I've watched. And it's unacceptable.

Even if we ignore the way this impacts the intent of a sentence, this is ableist by its nature. When subtitles are made, they are made to fill the gap in a deaf or HOH person's TV experience. When you don't accurately fill that gap, or fill it partway, or half ass it, you are cutting corners on a disability aid. It's like if you sold someone a wheelchair with the wheels not pumped with enough air, or giving someone a hearing aid with damaged battery capacity.

When deaf or HOH people watch TV or movies and they use subtitles, they are relying on those subtitles to give them the most accurate wording possible. So why are companies directing or allowing their transcriptionists to half ass or cut down their subtitles? Every piece of media should be having its subtitles checked for accuracy before they're approved, and subtitles that cut corners should be amended before a show with subtitles is published or aired.

Subtitles should never censor words that aren't censored in audio

If a show or movie has swearing in it, of any kind, the subtitles should accurately depict what is happening audibly. If the audio has swear words censored, the subtitles should depict the noise - or lack thereof - that is used to censor the word. Subtitles should never be censored when the audio isn't.

Not only does this touch on the same issue from the last section, it's also ableist in another way. Not only are you giving deaf and HOH people a different experience than hearing people, you're also infantilizing them by disallowing them from hearing swear words that hearing viewers can hear.

Deaf and HOH adults are not children. They have just as much right to read the word "fuck" as a hearing person does to hear it. Censoring subtitles is disrespectful, ableist, and infantilizing and it needs to stop.

Make a change

I'm not familiar with the details of the ADA and how it regards subtitles, but if anyone would like to work with me to do something about this, I would really like to fight for subtitles to have more regulation.

If the ADA prohibits inaccurate subtitles, we should be reporting companies like Netflix who constantly provide inaccurate subtitles. If it doesn't, we should be fighting to amend the ADA to include regulations for subtitle accuracy.

Anyone who's researched this before or who knows more about it than I do, please tell me what you know or give me some sources I can look into myself. I would research from scratch but I'm disabled and don't have a lot of spoons for it, which is why I'd like to work together with others.

adhbabey

When watching Encanto, I saw the subs doing "speaking in -language-" and I also comments n posts of people praising that "it's just for those who speak that language". No it's fucking not!! It's inaccessible if it doesn't have the damn words!! Especially for those who speak that language and are hard of hearing! Fuck! It's just bad!!

Of course it didn't happen in all the movie and subtitles it mostly. But I hear in theatres that they didn't do all of it. It just :/// inaccessible.

thewriterofawesomeness
allthingslinguistic

A nice summary of the problems with speech-only language approaches for deaf kids and how they came to be in the first place. Excerpt: 

Basically, parents are often told that they have to choose between speaking or sign language for their children. Since most people in the U.S. don’t sign, many opt for focusing solely on spoken language, enrolling their children into speech therapy and audiological training. About 80% of children born deaf in the developed world will get a cochlear implant later on, but the problem is that their brains may not be equipped to understand the complex notion of language by the time that happens.

“Cochlear implants create an electronic symbol, not the ability to hear,” Hall said. “So they miss that first year of life and exposure to language anyway, and [when they get a cochlear implant], kids don’t have any language foundation to help them decode these electronic signals.”

How can a child learn the ABCs in kindergarten if, by age 5, they’ve never really been conceptually introduced to the idea of words and their meaning? Language deprivation has reverberating effects on relationships, education, independence — plus critical skills like memory organization, literacy and mathematics. As one 2012 paper put it, “the brain of a newborn is designed for early acquisition of language.”

“I’ve worked with many students who are language-deprived. Often, they show up to school with only two or three words in their vocabulary,” April Bottoms, a graduate student at Boston University’s Education of the Deaf program, said through an interpreter. “Can they learn how to write, read and get the foundations of education? No. I have to connect with them through shared gazing.” […]

The logical solution appears to be teaching children sign language, even in tandem with more popular, speech-based methods. But somehow, teaching ASL to every deaf child is still at the center of a century-old debate.

Read the whole thing

slecnaztemnot

TL’DR: The reasons are ableism, not understanding how language works and the fact that Alexander Graham Bell was a dick. (also money, must not forget money)

mewiet

THIS!

Something that my ASL classes were constantly taught–by a woman who was Hard of Hearing and came from two generations of Deaf family members–was people who are taught ASL and then taught the oral method learn the oral method A) MUCH FASTER and B) are far more proficient in the oral method.

Contrary to what TV and movies will have you believe, lip reading is really freaking hard and most D/deaf people can’t do it and if they can, even fewer do it well.

And she had some tragic stories about kids who severely backslid in their language development because their lazy, ableist parents decided to force the oral method on them because the effort of learning ASL was too difficult for the parents and thus banned their kids from speaking Sign using the justification that the children would be too lazy at learning the oral method if they were simultaneously allowed to continue Signing. It’s utterly cruel.

aegipan-omnicorn

From the Wikipedia article on oralism, the section on the 19th Century:

Before the Clarke School for the Deaf (now the Clarke School for Hearing and Speech) made its mark in deaf American education in the 1860s, there was a popular support of manualism.[6] Manual language soon became a less popular choice for deaf education due to the new Darwinist perspective 

AKA: Eugenics. The reason Alexander Graham Bell wanted oral-only education for deaf children is because he was afraid Deaf people could talk freely to each other, they might fall in love, and two Deaf parents might have Deaf kids.

capricorn-0mnikorn

There’s a post that’s recirculating on my dashboard, today (17 June, 2021), aimed at animators and artists who want to draw people speaking. It’s image-heavy, I don’t have enough oomph to do all the descriptions, and I don’t want to hijack the post. But here’s a link to it:

Phoneme Chart, by TheEndisNearUS.

Take a look at the first two columns, with the phonetic symbols for human speech, along with how those sounds are spelled in English. Then take a look at the second two columns, with photos and drawings of human mouth shapes as they make those sounds.

Absolutely nowhere in that chart is a single sound made by a unique mouth / lip shape. At minimum, there are two different sounds, and some have as many as six.

This is why forcing a child to learn to lipread especially as their first exposure to language, is both absurd and abusive.

ifelsegotobreak
annoyedlord

July is disability awareness month but a lot of people tend to forget it :/ :/ :/

annoyedlord

It’s all OK if you didn’t know, don’t feel bad about it, it’s a great occasion to listen to disabled people! We might not have pretty flags who will catch your attentions like during pride months, but we’re still here!

annoyedlord

I see a lot of people (esp disabled ppl) feeling bad for not knowing it’s this month but no!! It’s all okay if you didn’t know! Don’t worry no one is going to be mad after you, I phrased it poorly in the og post. I’m sorry if my words made you feel bad.

Please take care of yourself and be proud of who you are! ♥️

ifelsegotobreak

Why do we need a month? Honestly want to know.

canvasoforange

Why do we need a month? Well we don’t need one but we sure as hell deserve one! Largely due to the history of the disability rights movement that is still ongoing. As a community, despite being somewhere around 25% of the global population, we are constantly dehumanized by nondisabed people, and are often taught internalized ableism and self loathing.

Eugenics is still rampant, disabled people are still killed or given less care for being disabled, and policies do not care about us. After over a year of a pandemic that disproportionately has harmed and killed disabled people, long covid makes more people disabled… as Covid-implemented accessibility like telehealth, remote work, grocery delivery, etc is rescinded as more nondisabled people are safe to ‘return to normal‘. Disabled people deserve to have a time where we can be proud of who we are, when it is so shamed in every other facet of life.

We deserve to love ourselves, celebrate our achievements, and look at how far we’ve come as a community. This July is the 31st anniversary of the ADA in the US, and while it still has room for improvements, it was a landmark piece of legislation that helped millions of people, and that’s Important.

one-true-houselight
one-true-houselight

Was talking with @canvasoforange about a fun little SPN crossover (yes, I know Cas is out of The Empty, this happened before the finale)

Sam and Dean do research, like they’ve never researched before. Maybe it’s because things are ok, for once in a long time. Jack had taken Chuck’s place, everyone was back…

Well. Almost everyone. And that’s why the two brothers sit at a table, poring over texts. They try to ignore strangeness of the table being in a sunny home, trees swaying in the breeze. Just another reminder that things were, finally, after so many years, moving in something of an upward direction.

“I’ve got something.” Sam looked up to see Dean pointing at something in an old book. The fiery determination in his eyes almost erased the deep bags under them. Sam slid closer and read the passage, eyebrows furrowing. “It connnects with that thing you found in the red book.”

“I think you’re right.” Dean grabbed his coat off the back of his chair, already at the door before the second sleeve was on. Sam nodded, finding a blank paper on the table and scribbling a note to Eileen.

“Sam!”

~

“We could have waited for Jack to figure out how to open The Empty, Dean,” muttered Sam, batting a still smoking patch on his jacket.

“No. Not if we knew we could get in.” Dean was wrapping his hand, trying to keep calm. He couldn’t let the tide of emotions in his chest make him sloppy, not here, not now. This was too important.

“So you enjoy deadly, biblical puzzle rooms?”

“They’re stimulating, Sam. Besides, we might not have too many opportunities like this, with Jack fixing everything.”

“Sure.” Dean finished his hand, and he and Sam continued down the hallway. After a few twists and turns, they came to an anachronistic, but otherwise standard, steel door at the end of a long hallway.

“The hell?” They stopped for a second, searching for the catch. When nothing appeared, they slowly made their way down the hallway, finally arriving at the door. There was a large, official looking sticker that read, THIS SPACE PROTECTED BY STERANKO SECURITY.

A moment of silence. Then, “The hell’s a Steranko?”

~

A few weeks later, they were in Portland. A Steranko was some kind of legendary security system that only one group had ever beaten. And they had beaten it twice.

So Sam and Dean walked into a brewpub, looking for Leverage consulting firm.

~

I have not seen enough SPN to actually write this, but imagine this completed with:

More and better Eileen content

Leverage competence porn, and it extends to hunting hell yeah

Requisite Sterling is Crowley etc joke (so That’s where he went!)

OT3 helping Dean with his feelings

And, of course, Destiel reunion.

Cheers! Feel free to run with this if you want.

canvasoforange

This is glorious- the Leverage fandom always has a fix-it fic for every fandom in need, and this was Needed. 

<3

you once again hold my life in your hands team free will meeting leverage like this would be iconic eileen always deserves more and better content
kayonwheels

Disability is not a gift.

notdifferent-justme

People have often said we should view our disabilities as a gift, to use them to help others, and that we are lucky to have them.
These ideas may sound thoughtful but, they’re not.
Being proud of your disability, or viewing it as a positive aspect of your life, is not the same as saying things like:

“I see having a disability as a gift you can teach others and change lives.”
“Your disability isn’t a limitation it’s a gift!”

Maybe you mean well but perhaps you are a little confused on what a gift really is?
A gift is something you give to someone to benefit their life and bring them happiness.
The way you describe my disability as being a gift doesn’t even benefit me. It benefits the lives you claim I should change and the people I should teach.
You see this as a gift when actually, it is just another form of inspiration ableism.
My disability is not a gift for myself, but for everyone else.

You see my disability this way because it makes you feel good about your life.
It makes you thankful for what you have.
You think I should be proud to be disabled because you want me to “open people’s eyes” and teach them about compassion and humanity. You want me to inspire others to feel better about themselves.
You see this as my obligation because I’m disabled.
I should be happy about this. I could change the world.
But, in reality, this “job” of mine is exhausting.

I shouldn’t have to convince every person that I meet that I should be treated with compassion and dignity.
I shouldn’t need to teach you that I am “just like everyone else despite my disability.” It is a parent’s job to teach their children about kindness and humanity.
I am not a parent and the world is not my child.
None of this is really mine when the “gift” you claim I have is for the people around me.

People around me claim I have a gift because I was lucky enough to be disabled. Yet, they use my life as an inspiration to be thankful they are not like me. They claim I have a gift and yet they would never wish their child to be like me, or hope they were like me themselves.
Because no one truly wants to be disabled.

A disability is not something you give to someone out of love or happiness, it is a random occurrence of life.
So no, my disability is not a gift.
To myself or anyone else.

sillyandquiteawkward-reblog
cleftfairy

not to be a bitch but it shouldn’t take someone literally telling you to not call people with facial d*formities ugly for you to think twice about it. people on this website really have never considered the possibility that we ACTUALLY exist and arent just a tiny minority of a minority

cleftfairy

actually reblog this listen to me when i say ive spent my whole life being told im ugly by doctors and adults lmfao. im sick of always being talked over or ignored about this- listen to actual disabled people when they tell you to shut the fuck up and consider the impact of what you say

cleftfairy

kind of a banger of a post but i know ppl are reblogging this and not actually internalizing it. just treat people w/ respect & maybe consider the impact of your words on OTHER people when you say them. like consider you’re making fun of someone you hate for valid reasons and you call one of their features ugly. think about why you’re saying that and who it might effect. criticize things that are actually important instead of throwing people like me under the bus 

canvasoforange

This is a big mood op. Like the amount of times I’ve been treated as lesser just due to my Goldenhar? Ridiculous.

It’s normal for me to deal with disfiguremisic discrimination day to day. Be it in public, school, work… I’ve seen it all.

(Disfiguremisic is a term coined by Mikaela Moody to describe the prejudice visually disfigured people like herself face)

I decided a long time ago that I couldn’t allow this to continue to affect kids like me without trying to intervene. and if that means I need to educate every face-typical person on their innate bias, perpetuation of disfiguremisic media tropes… I will. Person by person. Convention by convention.

Because it wears on you as a person to be constantly degraded from the day you’re born, or gain a scar. Emotionally, mentally, even physically. Its exhausting tbh.

Somewhere between 2-3% of babies aren’t born face-typical. So why are we excluded from positive representation, taught to internalize our feelings, to be ashamed. While others can’t seem to go a day without juvenile insults and hate.

actually disfigured goldenhar syndrome y'all i'm tired and it aint because i havent slept again.